|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
able future when it is no longer
necessary to distinguish between green design and good design,
when anything but sustainable building will be considered out
of the ordinary, and in fact, will be frowned upon as cheap and
short sighted. Recognizing that our built environment has
major impact on natural systems is the first step toward this
end; the understanding that human systems and the natural world
are intertwined in such a way that what we do to one, we do to
the other is beginning to manifest itself in the form of better
building practices across the country. Design is
primarily driven by the desire to improve quality of life.
Whether it occurs at the grass roots level or government
level, environmentally minded design is intensely centered on
this goal. Individual citizens have major impact on the
marketplace, but government has the ability to raise the bar to
a higher level in that it can affect policy making and laws
through its own actions and commitments. When planning
and constructing new buildings, government entities can
simultaneously enhance their stewardship of public resources,
both financial and natural, through a sustained reduction of
operating costs while providing environmental leadership as a
net benefit. It is in this context that the goals of good
design and government’s purpose coincide in an
extraordinary way to provide for the rights and common good of
society as a whole over the long haul.
For over a thousand years, the Iroquois
Nation has lived by the declaration that “in our every
deliberation, we must consider the impact of our decisions on
the next seven generations.” In fact, our own
system of government owes a great debt to the Iroquois form of
representational democracy, that inspired Jefferson, Madison
and Franklin in their conception of the US Constitution.
This notion of a long term relationship between
governance and ecological health served as the foundation of an
entire culture, and in fact, the sensitivity to future
generations’ rights defined the very context of policy
making. In the modern world, sustainable development and
green building are the current medium for this practice.
Waste stream reduction (or elimination), water efficiency
and quality, energy efficiency and alternative energy usage,
resource efficiency and forest stewardship are a few of the
touchstones that signal the intention to respect the rights and
needs of our descendants. However, this does not demand a
compromise of provisions for the
|
current generation. Designing out
waste, inefficiency and negative health effects will result in
cleaner air and water, reduced dependence on foreign energy,
enhanced productivity along with all the attendant economic
benefits. As this commitment propagates through society,
it not only benefits more and more Americans, it will have
global impact; hence, better design has the capability to
reverse the negative effects of our current practices on other
parts of the world.
Environmentally responsible public
buildings represent the best of society’s intentions.
They are the physical manifestation of our desire for
stronger communities with sustained value. The structures
we build should exemplify our recognition of not only the
necessary balance between economics and ecology, but the
interdependence of people’s and planetary health. A
government with these values fully integrated at all levels is
truly functioning with the ultimate sense of stewardship.
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
For more information:
J. Patrick Farley, AIA
Principal, Watershed PC
1520 W. Main St. #102
Richmond, VA 23220
(804) 254-8001
www.watershedarch.net
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|